- Home
- News
- Alternative Sch
- Flexischooling
- Non School
- Research
- Think Pieces
- Journals
- Books
- Events
- Share
Comments are closed.
Quick Links
- Centre for Personalised Education -Facebook
- Flexischooling Handbook: England and Wales
- Flexischooling Information Sheets
- Flexischooling Families UK -Facebook
- Flexischooling Practitioners UK -Facebook
- Light on Ed Research Network
- Home Ed and your LA -Facebook
- Legal Advice for Ed Startups -Facebook
- Educational Heretics Press -Facebook
- CPE-PEN (Twitter)
- CPE – Facebook Page
Categories
- AERO
- Alternatives
- Books & Reviews
- Conferences and Courses
- CPE / PEN News and Comment
- Democratic Ed News
- Digital Technologies
- E-briefing
- Educational Heretics Press
- Film and Animation
- Flexischool News
- Flexischooling
- Home-Based Education
- Human Scale Ed News
- innovation
- Journals
- Latest Journal
- Light on Ed Research Network
- Links
- Magazines
- News and Comment
- Personalised Education
- Research
- Self-Directed Ed News
- Self-Managed Learning College
- Small School News
- Think Pieces and Provocations
- Uncategorized
- Unschooling News
Home » Primary Schools and Academy Status
Primary Schools and Academy Status
Books & Reviews, CPE / PEN News and Comment, E-briefing, Links, Uncategorized · Tagged: academies, Centre for Personalised Education, Educational Heretics Press, EHP, Michael Foot, PEN, Personalised Education Now, Peter Holt
Thanks to Michael Foot for this letter sent to Michael Gove MP regarding Conservative Party policy on Primary Schools and academy status – 28th April 2009
Michael Gove Esq., MP
I note and applaud your wish to free our primary schools from the micro-management of their curriculum so that they are better able to innovate and better able to meet the differing needs of their pupils.
But I am concerned that you wish to achieve this by encouraging primary schools to become academies. My concern derives from the fact that, although academies are state-funded, they are subject to a greatly reduced degree of local and democratic accountability.
There are other ways, besides the academy route, of improving our primary schools. An appropriate root and branch reform of the National Curriculum and its assessment would represent a considerable step forward and would not involve a reduction in the local and democratic accountability that many of us value so highly.
In this context please find enclosed a copy of ‘Let Our Children Learn’ which I co-wrote a few years ago. In it you will find a description of the improved primary education that we both wish for. It is set within the story of a couple of days that we spent working with aprimary school class.
Your thoughts about ‘Let Our Children Learn’ and about my reservations concerning academy status would be appreciated. I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely
Michael Foot
P.S.’Let Our Children Learn’ was published by ‘Education Now’which has become ‘Personalised Education Now’. Do you know of ‘PEN’s work, and how many books it has published under the imprint of ‘EDucational Heretics Press’? I do commend them to you.
share:
About the author
Related Posts
Centre for Personalised Education Fact Sheet: ‘What should I do if my child’s other parent doesn’t want me to home educate him?
Centre for Personalised Education Fact Sheet: 'What should I do if my child's other parent doesn't want me
Home Education – Frequently Asked Questions. Centre for Personalised Education Advice.
Home Education - Frequently Asked Questions.
Centre for Personalised Education Advice.
Home
Centre for Personalised Education eNews 12th June 2019
Get the latest eNews from the Centre for Personalised Education here:
Centre for Personalised Education eNews
DfE Consultation on ‘Children not in School’ Centre for Personalised Education Response
The DfE Consultation on Children not in School Closes 24 June 2019.
This is
CPE Communications June 2019