- Home
- News
- Alternative Sch
- Flexischooling
- Non School
- Research
- Think Pieces
- Journals
- Books
- Events
- Share
Comments are closed.
Quick Links
- Centre for Personalised Education -Facebook
- Flexischooling Handbook: England and Wales
- Flexischooling Information Sheets
- Flexischooling Families UK -Facebook
- Flexischooling Practitioners UK -Facebook
- Light on Ed Research Network
- Home Ed and your LA -Facebook
- Legal Advice for Ed Startups -Facebook
- Educational Heretics Press -Facebook
- CPE-PEN (Twitter)
- CPE – Facebook Page
Categories
- AERO
- Alternatives
- Books & Reviews
- Conferences and Courses
- CPE / PEN News and Comment
- Democratic Ed News
- Digital Technologies
- E-briefing
- Educational Heretics Press
- Film and Animation
- Flexischool News
- Flexischooling
- Home-Based Education
- Human Scale Ed News
- innovation
- Journals
- Latest Journal
- Light on Ed Research Network
- Links
- Magazines
- News and Comment
- Personalised Education
- Research
- Self-Directed Ed News
- Self-Managed Learning College
- Small School News
- Think Pieces and Provocations
- Uncategorized
- Unschooling News
Home » A more useful and radical proposal.
A more useful and radical proposal.
CPE / PEN News and Comment, E-briefing, Think Pieces and Provocations · Tagged: voluntary schooling
PEN Comment: We can have as many reviews and reports as we like but the default education remains. One or two key radical proposals could really change the face of education for the 21st century.
Perhaps we’d actually do a lot better taking up the advice of Jim Strickland, a community based educator from Washington, USA. Jim writes about the ‘Dark Side of Schooling’ in Natural Life Magazine (NaturalLifeMagazine.com) March / April 2009. He draws upon Priesnitz, Gatto and Illich:
‘First we must make schooling voluntary. while many children thrive in our schools and appear to emerge relatively unscathed by its hidden curriculum, this is certainly not true for a growing percentage of students and their families, not to mention teh health of our democracy. How can we justify legally compelling citizens to submit to aporcess that is at best not working for them and possibly doing life-long damage? We can’t.’
Second we must make it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of school credentials alone. Since we know that there are a variety of effective pathways to developing skillsand knowledge, we must honor these as legitimate….
These two actions would remove the obstacles for effective change to occur over time… for those who aren’t thriving, who are actually being diminished and even harmed by compulsory schooling, there would be an acceptable way out that would not make them into social, economic or political outcast. And as a democracy, we can do no less.’
Jim’s latest article is links to a previous paper published in NaturalLife Magazine in Nov/Dec 2008 http://www.naturallifemagazine.com/0812/teacher_questions_compulsory_schooling.htm
share:
About the author
Related Posts
Centre for Personalised Education Fact Sheet: ‘What should I do if my child’s other parent doesn’t want me to home educate him?
Centre for Personalised Education Fact Sheet: 'What should I do if my child's other parent doesn't want me
Home Education – Frequently Asked Questions. Centre for Personalised Education Advice.
Home Education - Frequently Asked Questions.
Centre for Personalised Education Advice.
Home
Centre for Personalised Education eNews 12th June 2019
Get the latest eNews from the Centre for Personalised Education here:
Centre for Personalised Education eNews
DfE Consultation on ‘Children not in School’ Centre for Personalised Education Response
The DfE Consultation on Children not in School Closes 24 June 2019.
This is
CPE Communications June 2019